[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUVkpvQuRHqeRtQbrVHU7mb0rK7-TTFMHEgZ8k=_keMTSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 11:03:10 +0100
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] treewide: use -Wdeclaration-after-statement
On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 12:29 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 4:59 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> >
> > In a subsequent patch we'll move the kernel from using `-std=gnu89` to
> > `-std=gnu11`, permitting the use of additional C11 features such as
> > for-loop initial declarations.
> >
> > One contentious aspect of C99 is that it permits mixed declarations and
> > code, and for now at least, it seems preferable to enforce that
> > declarations must come first.
> >
> > These warnings were already disabled in the kernel itself, but not
> > for KBUILD_USERCFLAGS or the compat VDSO on arch/arm64, which uses
> > a separate set of CFLAGS.
> >
> > This patch fixes an existing violation in modpost.c, which is not
> > reported because of the missing flag in KBUILD_USERCFLAGS:
> >
> > | scripts/mod/modpost.c: In function ‘match’:
> > | scripts/mod/modpost.c:837:3: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
> > | 837 | const char *endp = p + strlen(p) - 1;
> > | | ^~~~~
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > [arnd: don't add a duplicate flag to the default set, update changelog]
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> I was able to build and boot on bare metal.
>
> No new warnings in my build-log here after switching to -std=gnu11.
>
> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> # LLVM/Clang v13.0.0 x86-64
>
I have re-tested with Debian's LLVM/Clang v14.0.0-rc2.
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> # LLVM/Clang v14.0.0-rc2 (x86-64)
- sed@ -
> - sed@ -
>
> > ---
> > Makefile | 3 ++-
> > arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile | 1 +
> > scripts/mod/modpost.c | 4 +++-
> > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > index 94fa9a849a7a..37ef6a555dcd 100644
> > --- a/Makefile
> > +++ b/Makefile
> > @@ -432,7 +432,8 @@ HOSTCXX = g++
> > endif
> >
> > export KBUILD_USERCFLAGS := -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes \
> > - -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89
> > + -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -std=gnu89 \
> > + -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> > export KBUILD_USERLDFLAGS :=
> >
> > KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS := $(KBUILD_USERCFLAGS) $(HOST_LFS_CFLAGS) $(HOSTCFLAGS)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
> > index 9378ea055bf2..ed181bedbffc 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso32/Makefile
> > @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ VDSO_CFLAGS += -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs \
> > -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common \
> > -Werror-implicit-function-declaration \
> > -Wno-format-security \
> > + -Wdeclaration-after-statement \
> > -std=gnu11
> > VDSO_CFLAGS += -O2
> > # Some useful compiler-dependent flags from top-level Makefile
> > diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> > index 6bfa33217914..fe693304b120 100644
> > --- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> > +++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> > @@ -833,8 +833,10 @@ static int match(const char *sym, const char * const pat[])
> > {
> > const char *p;
> > while (*pat) {
> > + const char *endp;
> > +
> > p = *pat++;
> > - const char *endp = p + strlen(p) - 1;
> > + endp = p + strlen(p) - 1;
> >
> > /* "*foo*" */
> > if (*p == '*' && *endp == '*') {
> > --
> > 2.29.2
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists