lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUUp1xT-i9ewsOJ4Ckk59L=kjh93U+2nEN81jTMJ-aSy=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 6 Mar 2022 11:04:23 +0100
From:   Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Kbuild: use -std=gnu11 for KBUILD_USERCFLAGS

On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 12:12 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 8:18 AM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 7:47 AM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 6:37 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Sedat,
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 07:26:05AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > > > Hey Nick!
> > > > >
> > > > > This only applies 1/3.
> > > > >
> > > > > $ b4 --version
> > > > > 0.8.0
> > > > >
> > > > > $ b4 am https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220301145233.3689119-1-arnd@kernel.org/
> > > > > -o - | git am -3
> > > > > Analyzing 14 messages in the thread
> > > > > Will use the latest revision: v3
> > > > > You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag
> > > > > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  ✓ [PATCH v3 1/3] Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11
> > > > >    ✓ Signed: DKIM/kernel.org
> > > > >    + Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> (✓ DKIM/kernel.org)
> > > > >  ERROR: missing [2/3]!
> > > > >  ERROR: missing [3/3]!
> > > > >  ---
> > > > >  NOTE: install patatt for end-to-end signature verification
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Total patches: 1
> > > > > ---
> > > > > WARNING: Thread incomplete!
> > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220301145233.3689119-1-arnd@kernel.org
> > > > > Base: not specified
> > > > > Wende an: Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11
> > > >
> > > > It looks like the threading somehow got broken, likely due to the [v3]
> > > > on the first patch and not the second or third:
> > > >
> > > > This worked for me on v5.17-rc6:
> > > >
> > > > $ for i in $(seq 1 3); do b4 shazam -P _ 20220301145233.3689119-"$i"-arnd@...nel.org; done
> > > >
> > > > "b4 shazam" is the equivalent of "b4 am -o - ... | git am" and the
> > > > "-P _" tells b4 to only fetch that exact message ID, not the whole
> > > > thread.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hmm, the universe is not good to me...
> > >
> > > $ for i in $(seq 1 3); do b4 shazam -P _
> > > 20220301145233.3689119-"$i"-arnd@...nel.org; done
> > > usage: b4 [-h] [--version] [-d] [-q] {mbox,am,attest,pr,ty,diff,kr} ...
> > > b4: error: argument subcmd: invalid choice: 'shazam' (choose from
> > > 'mbox', 'am', 'attest', 'pr', 'ty', 'diff', 'kr')
> > > usage: b4 [-h] [--version] [-d] [-q] {mbox,am,attest,pr,ty,diff,kr} ...
> > > b4: error: argument subcmd: invalid choice: 'shazam' (choose from
> > > 'mbox', 'am', 'attest', 'pr', 'ty', 'diff', 'kr')
> > > usage: b4 [-h] [--version] [-d] [-q] {mbox,am,attest,pr,ty,diff,kr} ...
> > > b4: error: argument subcmd: invalid choice: 'shazam' (choose from
> > > 'mbox', 'am', 'attest', 'pr', 'ty', 'diff', 'kr')
> > >
> > > Do I need a higher version of b4 (here: v0.8.0)?
> > >
> > > Check myself... b4.git:
> > >
> > > commit 7c1d044ff1d5235e598d4c777c4abfe60e0a09a8
> > > ("shazam: change default behaviour to be "apply-here"")
> > >
> > > ...is post-v0.8.0.
> > >
> >
> > I brutally applied the post-v0.8.0 patches stolen from b4.git over my
> > local distro b4 files.
> >
> > And was able to apply the triple:
> >
> > $ git log --oneline --no-merges
> > 5.17.0-rc6-1-amd64-clang13-lto..5.17.0-rc6-2-amd64-clang13-lto
> > 96a4222bdd4c (for-5.17/kbuild-std_gnu11-arndb-20220301) Kbuild: use
> > -std=gnu11 for KBUILD_USERCFLAGS
> > c4e8cef401a8 treewide: use -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> > 6a7cc105b238 Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11
> >
>
> I was able to build and boot on bare metal.
>
> No new warnings in my build-log here after switching to -std=gnu11.
>
> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> # LLVM/Clang v13.0.0 x86-64
>

I have re-tested with Debian's LLVM/Clang v14.0.0-rc2.

Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> # LLVM/Clang v14.0.0-rc2 (x86-64)

- sed@ -

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ