linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.16 088/186] net: dsa: microchip: fix bridging with more than two member ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220307091656.545913586@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  7 Mar 2022 10:18:46 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Svenning Sørensen <sss@...omea.com>,
        Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 088/186] net: dsa: microchip: fix bridging with more than two member ports

From: Svenning Sørensen <sss@...omea.com>

commit 3d00827a90db6f79abc7cdc553887f89a2e0a184 upstream.

Commit b3612ccdf284 ("net: dsa: microchip: implement multi-bridge support")
plugged a packet leak between ports that were members of different bridges.
Unfortunately, this broke another use case, namely that of more than two
ports that are members of the same bridge.

After that commit, when a port is added to a bridge, hardware bridging
between other member ports of that bridge will be cleared, preventing
packet exchange between them.

Fix by ensuring that the Port VLAN Membership bitmap includes any existing
ports in the bridge, not just the port being added.

Fixes: b3612ccdf284 ("net: dsa: microchip: implement multi-bridge support")
Signed-off-by: Svenning Sørensen <sss@...omea.com>
Tested-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ void ksz_update_port_member(struct ksz_d
 	struct dsa_switch *ds = dev->ds;
 	u8 port_member = 0, cpu_port;
 	const struct dsa_port *dp;
-	int i;
+	int i, j;
 
 	if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, port))
 		return;
@@ -45,13 +45,33 @@ void ksz_update_port_member(struct ksz_d
 			continue;
 		if (!dp->bridge_dev || dp->bridge_dev != other_dp->bridge_dev)
 			continue;
+		if (other_p->stp_state != BR_STATE_FORWARDING)
+			continue;
 
-		if (other_p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING &&
-		    p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING) {
+		if (p->stp_state == BR_STATE_FORWARDING) {
 			val |= BIT(port);
 			port_member |= BIT(i);
 		}
 
+		/* Retain port [i]'s relationship to other ports than [port] */
+		for (j = 0; j < ds->num_ports; j++) {
+			const struct dsa_port *third_dp;
+			struct ksz_port *third_p;
+
+			if (j == i)
+				continue;
+			if (j == port)
+				continue;
+			if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, j))
+				continue;
+			third_p = &dev->ports[j];
+			if (third_p->stp_state != BR_STATE_FORWARDING)
+				continue;
+			third_dp = dsa_to_port(ds, j);
+			if (third_dp->bridge_dev == dp->bridge_dev)
+				val |= BIT(j);
+		}
+
 		dev->dev_ops->cfg_port_member(dev, i, val | cpu_port);
 	}