[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220307091658.632822797@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 10:20:01 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 163/186] net: dcb: disable softirqs in dcbnl_flush_dev()
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
[ Upstream commit 10b6bb62ae1a49ee818fc479cf57b8900176773e ]
Ido Schimmel points out that since commit 52cff74eef5d ("dcbnl : Disable
software interrupts before taking dcb_lock"), the DCB API can be called
by drivers from softirq context.
One such in-tree example is the chelsio cxgb4 driver:
dcb_rpl
-> cxgb4_dcb_handle_fw_update
-> dcb_ieee_setapp
If the firmware for this driver happened to send an event which resulted
in a call to dcb_ieee_setapp() at the exact same time as another
DCB-enabled interface was unregistering on the same CPU, the softirq
would deadlock, because the interrupted process was already holding the
dcb_lock in dcbnl_flush_dev().
Fix this unlikely event by using spin_lock_bh() in dcbnl_flush_dev() as
in the rest of the dcbnl code.
Fixes: 91b0383fef06 ("net: dcb: flush lingering app table entries for unregistered devices")
Reported-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220302193939.1368823-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/dcb/dcbnl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dcb/dcbnl.c b/net/dcb/dcbnl.c
index 36c91273daac..dc4fb699b56c 100644
--- a/net/dcb/dcbnl.c
+++ b/net/dcb/dcbnl.c
@@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ static void dcbnl_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
{
struct dcb_app_type *itr, *tmp;
- spin_lock(&dcb_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&dcb_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(itr, tmp, &dcb_app_list, list) {
if (itr->ifindex == dev->ifindex) {
@@ -2086,7 +2086,7 @@ static void dcbnl_flush_dev(struct net_device *dev)
}
}
- spin_unlock(&dcb_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&dcb_lock);
}
static int dcbnl_netdevice_event(struct notifier_block *nb,
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists