[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff33d3a5-d2f3-8a7d-204e-0ab7205b932d@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 12:44:06 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, broonie@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] ASoC: dt-bindings: Document Microchip's PDMC
On 07/03/2022 12:34, Codrin.Ciubotariu@...rochip.com wrote:
> On 07.03.2022 13:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 07/03/2022 11:04, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
>>> +description:
>>> + The Microchip Pulse Density Microphone Controller (PDMC) interfaces up to 4 digital microphones
>>> + having Pulse Density Modulated (PDM) outputs.
>>
>> This exceeds 80 characters.
>
> I thought it was raised to 100. checkpatch doesn't report anything also.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17-rc7/source/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst#L104
The hard-constraint was lifted, but still 80 is preferred, unless
readability is increased with 100. That's not the case - readability is
the same, so keep 80.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists