lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFr1PzSaiKqB4ZoqTS_8bGsEH=aB3ARhxyGu+cYeRqeBew@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Mar 2022 13:17:15 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Jean Rene Dawin <jdawin@...h.uni-bielefeld.de>,
        "H . Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc:     Huijin Park <huijin.park@...sung.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Restore (almost) the busy polling for MMC_SEND_OP_COND

On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 11:57, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Commit 76bfc7ccc2fa ("mmc: core: adjust polling interval for CMD1"),
> significantly decreased the polling period from ~10-12ms into just a couple
> of us. The purpose was to decrease the total time spent in the busy polling
> loop, but unfortunate it has lead to problems, that causes eMMC cards to
> never gets out busy and thus fails to be initialized.
>
> To fix the problem, but also to try to keep some of the new improved
> behaviour, let's start by using a polling period of 1-2ms, which then
> increases for each loop, according to common polling loop in
> __mmc_poll_for_busy().
>
> Reported-by: Jean Rene Dawin <jdawin@...h.uni-bielefeld.de>
> Reported-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>
> Cc: Huijin Park <huijin.park@...sung.com>
> Fixes: 76bfc7ccc2fa ("mmc: core: adjust polling interval for CMD1")
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>

Applied for fixes and by adding two tested-by tags from you, thanks!

Kind regards
Uffe


> ---
>
> Jean Rene and H. Nikolaus, if this doesn't work, please try extending the
> the MMC_OP_COND_PERIOD_US a bit, to so see if we can find a value that always
> works.
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/core/block.c   |  2 +-
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c     |  2 +-
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.h |  3 ++-
>  drivers/mmc/core/sd.c      |  2 +-
>  5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> index 8d718aa56d33..4e67c1403cc9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c
> @@ -1908,7 +1908,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_card_busy(struct mmc_card *card, struct request *req)
>
>         cb_data.card = card;
>         cb_data.status = 0;
> -       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(card->host, MMC_BLK_TIMEOUT_MS,
> +       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(card->host, 0, MMC_BLK_TIMEOUT_MS,
>                                   &mmc_blk_busy_cb, &cb_data);
>
>         /*
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> index 13abfcd130a5..43d1b9b2fa49 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
> @@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ static int mmc_sleep(struct mmc_host *host)
>                 goto out_release;
>         }
>
> -       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, timeout_ms, &mmc_sleep_busy_cb, host);
> +       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, 0, timeout_ms, &mmc_sleep_busy_cb, host);
>
>  out_release:
>         mmc_retune_release(host);
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> index d63d1c735335..180d7e9d3400 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>
>  #define MMC_BKOPS_TIMEOUT_MS           (120 * 1000) /* 120s */
>  #define MMC_SANITIZE_TIMEOUT_MS                (240 * 1000) /* 240s */
> +#define MMC_OP_COND_PERIOD_US          (1 * 1000) /* 1ms */
> +#define MMC_OP_COND_TIMEOUT_MS         1000 /* 1s */
>
>  static const u8 tuning_blk_pattern_4bit[] = {
>         0xff, 0x0f, 0xff, 0x00, 0xff, 0xcc, 0xc3, 0xcc,
> @@ -232,7 +234,9 @@ int mmc_send_op_cond(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr, u32 *rocr)
>         cmd.arg = mmc_host_is_spi(host) ? 0 : ocr;
>         cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R3 | MMC_CMD_BCR;
>
> -       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, 1000, &__mmc_send_op_cond_cb, &cb_data);
> +       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, MMC_OP_COND_PERIOD_US,
> +                                 MMC_OP_COND_TIMEOUT_MS,
> +                                 &__mmc_send_op_cond_cb, &cb_data);
>         if (err)
>                 return err;
>
> @@ -495,13 +499,14 @@ static int mmc_busy_cb(void *cb_data, bool *busy)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> -int __mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int timeout_ms,
> +int __mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int period_us,
> +                       unsigned int timeout_ms,
>                         int (*busy_cb)(void *cb_data, bool *busy),
>                         void *cb_data)
>  {
>         int err;
>         unsigned long timeout;
> -       unsigned int udelay = 32, udelay_max = 32768;
> +       unsigned int udelay = period_us ? period_us : 32, udelay_max = 32768;
>         bool expired = false;
>         bool busy = false;
>
> @@ -546,7 +551,7 @@ int mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int timeout_ms,
>         cb_data.retry_crc_err = retry_crc_err;
>         cb_data.busy_cmd = busy_cmd;
>
> -       return __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, timeout_ms, &mmc_busy_cb, &cb_data);
> +       return __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, 0, timeout_ms, &mmc_busy_cb, &cb_data);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmc_poll_for_busy);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.h b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.h
> index 9c813b851d0b..09ffbc00908b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.h
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.h
> @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ int mmc_can_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card);
>  int mmc_switch_status(struct mmc_card *card, bool crc_err_fatal);
>  bool mmc_prepare_busy_cmd(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd,
>                           unsigned int timeout_ms);
> -int __mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int timeout_ms,
> +int __mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned int period_us,
> +                       unsigned int timeout_ms,
>                         int (*busy_cb)(void *cb_data, bool *busy),
>                         void *cb_data);
>  int mmc_poll_for_busy(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int timeout_ms,
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> index 24b0418a24bb..68df6b2f49cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> @@ -1671,7 +1671,7 @@ static int sd_poweroff_notify(struct mmc_card *card)
>
>         cb_data.card = card;
>         cb_data.reg_buf = reg_buf;
> -       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(card->host, SD_POWEROFF_NOTIFY_TIMEOUT_MS,
> +       err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(card->host, 0, SD_POWEROFF_NOTIFY_TIMEOUT_MS,
>                                   &sd_busy_poweroff_notify_cb, &cb_data);
>
>  out:
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ