[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220307124652.GB21350@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 13:46:52 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: trix@...hat.com
Cc: pablo@...filter.org, kadlec@...filter.org, fw@...len.de,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conditionally use ct and ctinfo
trix@...hat.com <trix@...hat.com> wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>
> The setting ct and ctinfo are controlled by
> CONF_NF_CONNTRACK. So their use should also
> be controlled.
Any reason for this change?
We try to avoid ifdef where possible, unless it avoids a compiler
warning/build/linker issue.
This doesn't change generated code for me (NF_CONNTRACK=n) either.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists