lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 10:52:19 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/184] 5.16.13-rc2 review On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:28:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.13 release. > There are 184 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Mar 2022 16:21:20 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > Your cycles are getting too short for my test system to provide results in time. It gets overwhelmed, especially when there are updates affecting all stable branches which trigger a complete rebuild of all those branches. I see you published the current set of releases already, so I won't bother sending test feedback this time around. Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists