[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YienMYvdhGPCcPSv@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 19:57:53 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/184] 5.16.13-rc2 review
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:52:19AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:28:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.13 release.
> > There are 184 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Mar 2022 16:21:20 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Your cycles are getting too short for my test system to provide results
> in time. It gets overwhelmed, especially when there are updates affecting
> all stable branches which trigger a complete rebuild of all those branches.
Sorry, but this one had to go out a bit sooner for reasons I don't want
to speculate about :)
Anyway, I checked your builders, and they all looked ok except the 5.15
tree, which I know is broken on MIPS right now.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists