linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/184] 5.16.13-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d687840f-1622-59de-8369-f1a8c090ae46@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:49:49 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 000/184] 5.16.13-rc2 review

On 3/8/22 10:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 10:52:19AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 05:28:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.13 release.
>>> There are 184 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Mar 2022 16:21:20 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Your cycles are getting too short for my test system to provide results
>> in time. It gets overwhelmed, especially when there are updates affecting
>> all stable branches which trigger a complete rebuild of all those branches.
> 
> Sorry, but this one had to go out a bit sooner for reasons I don't want
> to speculate about :)
> 

Another one, after the write file issue ? Sigh.
I really hate that the Powers That Be don't tell me about that stuff :-(.

We have severe conflicts against all Chrome OS kernel branches in this series.
I hope that fix was worth it.

> Anyway, I checked your builders, and they all looked ok except the 5.15
> tree, which I know is broken on MIPS right now.
> 
Hmm, sorry, I didn't realize that there was more than one END issue.

Guenter