[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d46eef1d-081e-337c-cc36-a19373be8a1a@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:29:46 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, knsathya@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 07/30] x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest
On 3/2/22 06:27, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Virtualization Exceptions (#VE) are delivered to TDX guests due to
> specific guest actions which may happen in either user space or the
> kernel:
>
> * Specific instructions (WBINVD, for example)
> * Specific MSR accesses
> * Specific CPUID leaf accesses
> * Access to specific guest physical addresses
...
> arch/x86/coco/tdx.c | 31 +++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h | 4 ++
> arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h | 21 +++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/idt.c | 3 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I know it took a long time to get here, but it's really, really nice
that this ended up being all done in C without any nastiness in the
kernel to deal with things like NMIs.
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists