[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <133a741f-02ae-49bd-1bc4-87ec42ab024b@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:33:34 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, knsathya@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 10/30] x86/tdx: Handle CPUID via #VE
On 3/2/22 06:27, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> In TDX guests, most CPUID leaf/sub-leaf combinations are virtualized
> by the TDX module while some trigger #VE.
>
> Implement the #VE handling for EXIT_REASON_CPUID by handing it through
> the hypercall, which in turn lets the TDX module handle it by invoking
> the host VMM.
>
> More details on CPUID Virtualization can be found in the TDX module
> specification, the section titled "CPUID Virtualization".
>
> Note that VMM that handles the hypercall is not trusted. It can return
> data that may steer the guest kernel in wrong direct. Only allow VMM
> to control range reserved for hypervisor communication. Return all-zeros
> for any CPUID outside the range.
>
> Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
It would be nice to also mention the implications of the all-zero CPUID
policy. I'll plan to add a sentence or two when we apply this.
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists