[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r17bnbxx.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2022 12:37:14 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] Fix LKDTM for PPC64/IA64/PARISC v4
Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au> writes:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:40:55 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> PPC64/IA64/PARISC have function descriptors. LKDTM doesn't work
>> on those three architectures because LKDTM messes up function
>> descriptors with functions.
>>
>> This series does some cleanup in the three architectures and
>> refactors function descriptors so that it can then easily use it
>> in a generic way in LKDTM.
>>
>> [...]
>
> Applied to powerpc/next.
I also have it in an rc2-based topic branch if there are any merge
conflicts that people want to resolve, I don't see any in linux-next at
the moment though.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git/log/?h=topic/func-desc-lkdtm
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists