[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202203090829.53A243306@keescook>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:30:17 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] Fix LKDTM for PPC64/IA64/PARISC v4
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 12:37:14PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@...erman.id.au> writes:
> > On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:40:55 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >> PPC64/IA64/PARISC have function descriptors. LKDTM doesn't work
> >> on those three architectures because LKDTM messes up function
> >> descriptors with functions.
> >>
> >> This series does some cleanup in the three architectures and
> >> refactors function descriptors so that it can then easily use it
> >> in a generic way in LKDTM.
> >>
> >> [...]
> >
> > Applied to powerpc/next.
>
> I also have it in an rc2-based topic branch if there are any merge
> conflicts that people want to resolve, I don't see any in linux-next at
> the moment though.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git/log/?h=topic/func-desc-lkdtm
Thanks! I've got some core changes coming for lkdtm, but I'm waiting
until after the merge window to rebase them and get them into -next.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists