lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YikkLnnQX3CJoi37@yaz-ubuntu>
Date:   Wed, 9 Mar 2022 22:03:26 +0000
From:   Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mchehab@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com,
        rric@...nel.org, Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/24] EDAC/amd64: Define function to check DRAM limit
 address

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:06:07AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 08:40:59PM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> > Move the DRAM limit check into a separate helper function.
> 
> You're still writing the "what" in commit messages - pls make a note to
> write about "why" you're doing a change instead.
> 
> Because I don't see why you're doing this. Because
> umc_normaddr_to_sysaddr() is supposed to call helper functions only?
> 
> Now if you had the "why" I wouldn't be wondering...
> 
> :)
>

Yes, you're right. I'll update this.

Yes, the goal is to break up the translation procedure into discrete
high-level steps.

Thanks,
Yazen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ