[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45fa6cff-948f-93e0-388c-42da30e70efb@omp.ru>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 12:00:03 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
<cgel.zte@...il.com>
CC: <chi.minghao@....com.cn>, <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ata: pata_pxa: Use platform_get_irq() to get the
interrupt
On 09.03.2022 11:55, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>>> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>>>
>>> platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static
>>> allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue
>>> when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property
>>> in the node as this bypasses the hierarchical setup and messes up the
>>> irq chaining.
>>>
>>> In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core
>>> code use platform_get_irq().
>>>
>>> v1->v2:
>>> - Use more specific in the subject: ata: pata_pxa:
>>> - Switch to returning 'irq'
>>> v2->v3:
>>> - drop the unlikely()
>>
>> Looks good. FYI, the changelog above should be placed under the "---"
>> after your Signed-off-by so that it does not stay as part of the commit
>> message. No need to resend, I will remove this when applying.
>>
>> Sergey,
>>
>> Review OK ?
>
> Yes.
Ugh, replied from the wrong account. I had provided my Reviewed-by: tag
already...
> Although, strictly speaking, we still need to check for IRQ0 as well...
The platform_get_irq() patch preventing IRQ0 hasn't landed still...
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists