[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4f60079-9a99-c8e6-4a3c-4c77597cc151@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 11:55:56 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: chi.minghao@....com.cn, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, s.shtylyov@....ru, zealci@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ata: pata_pxa: Use platform_get_irq() to get the
interrupt
On 09.03.2022 10:31, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>>
>> platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static
>> allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue
>> when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property
>> in the node as this bypasses the hierarchical setup and messes up the
>> irq chaining.
>>
>> In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core
>> code use platform_get_irq().
>>
>> v1->v2:
>> - Use more specific in the subject: ata: pata_pxa:
>> - Switch to returning 'irq'
>> v2->v3:
>> - drop the unlikely()
>
> Looks good. FYI, the changelog above should be placed under the "---"
> after your Signed-off-by so that it does not stay as part of the commit
> message. No need to resend, I will remove this when applying.
>
> Sergey,
>
> Review OK ?
Yes.
Although, strictly speaking, we still need to check for IRQ0 as well...
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists