[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <876010c1-0558-bd1e-e133-05403e5a167b@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 08:56:01 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, digetx@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Cc: vdumpa@...dia.com, Snikam@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 3/4] memory: tegra: Add memory controller channels
support
On 02/03/2022 19:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/03/2022 09:43, Ashish Mhetre wrote:
>> From tegra186 onwards, memory controller support multiple channels.
>> Add support for mapping address spaces of these channels.
>> During error interrupts from memory controller, appropriate registers
>> from these channels need to be accessed for logging error info.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c | 6 ++++++
>> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra194.c | 1 +
>> drivers/memory/tegra/tegra234.c | 1 +
>> include/soc/tegra/mc.h | 7 +++++++
>> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c
>> index bf3abb6..3cda1d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/mc.c
>> @@ -749,6 +749,12 @@ static int tegra_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (IS_ERR(mc->regs))
>> return PTR_ERR(mc->regs);
>>
>> + if (mc->soc->ops && mc->soc->ops->map_regs) {
>> + err = mc->soc->ops->map_regs(mc, pdev);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> + }
>> +
>> mc->debugfs.root = debugfs_create_dir("mc", NULL);
>>
>> if (mc->soc->ops && mc->soc->ops->probe) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186.c
>> index 3d15388..59a4425 100644
>> --- a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186.c
>> +++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra186.c
>> @@ -139,11 +139,31 @@ static int tegra186_mc_probe_device(struct tegra_mc *mc, struct device *dev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int tegra186_mc_map_regs(struct tegra_mc *mc,
>> + struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + mc->mcb_regs = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 1, &res);
>> + if (IS_ERR(mc->mcb_regs))
>> + return PTR_ERR(mc->mcb_regs);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < mc->soc->num_channels; i++) {
>> + mc->mc_regs[i] = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, i + 2, &res);
>> + if (IS_ERR(mc->mc_regs[i]))
>> + return PTR_ERR(mc->mc_regs[i]);
>
> This breaks the ABI, so I need Thierry's ack that such ABI break is
> perfectly ok.
We should not break the DT ABI and so if all the reg entries it should
still be able to work.
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists