[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a235df4f-ba06-1b01-c588-06f12d8341b7@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:12:52 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] KVM: x86: nSVM: support PAUSE filter threshold and
count when cpu_pm=on
On 3/1/22 15:36, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> Allow L1 to use these settings if L0 disables PAUSE interception
> (AKA cpu_pm=on)
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 6 ++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> index 37510cb206190..4cb0bc49986d5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> @@ -664,6 +664,12 @@ static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> if (!nested_vmcb_needs_vls_intercept(svm))
> svm->vmcb->control.virt_ext |= VIRTUAL_VMLOAD_VMSAVE_ENABLE_MASK;
>
> + if (svm->pause_filter_enabled)
> + svm->vmcb->control.pause_filter_count = svm->nested.ctl.pause_filter_count;
> +
> + if (svm->pause_threshold_enabled)
> + svm->vmcb->control.pause_filter_thresh = svm->nested.ctl.pause_filter_thresh;
I think this should be
if (kvm_pause_in_guest(vcpu->kvm)) {
/* copy from VMCB12 if guest has CPUID, else set to 0 */
} else {
/* copy from VMCB01, unconditionally */
}
and likewise it should be copied back to VMCB01 unconditionally on
vmexit if !kvm_pause_in_guest(vcpu->kvm).
> nested_svm_transition_tlb_flush(vcpu);
>
> /* Enter Guest-Mode */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 6a571eed32ef4..52198e63c5fc4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -4008,6 +4008,17 @@ static void svm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> svm->v_vmload_vmsave_enabled = vls && guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_V_VMSAVE_VMLOAD);
>
> + if (kvm_pause_in_guest(vcpu->kvm)) {
> + svm->pause_filter_enabled = pause_filter_count > 0 &&
> + guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PAUSEFILTER);
> +
> + svm->pause_threshold_enabled = pause_filter_thresh > 0 &&
> + guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PFTHRESHOLD);
Why only if the module parameters are >0? The module parameter is
unused if pause-in-guest is active.
> + } else {
> + svm->pause_filter_enabled = false;
> + svm->pause_threshold_enabled = false;
> + }
> +
> svm_recalc_instruction_intercepts(vcpu, svm);
>
> /* For sev guests, the memory encryption bit is not reserved in CR3. */
> @@ -4763,6 +4774,12 @@ static __init void svm_set_cpu_caps(void)
> if (vls)
> kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_V_VMSAVE_VMLOAD);
>
> + if (pause_filter_count)
> + kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_PAUSEFILTER);
> +
> + if (pause_filter_thresh)
> + kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_PFTHRESHOLD);
Likewise, this should be set using just boot_cpu_has, not the module
parameters.
Paolo
> /* Nested VM can receive #VMEXIT instead of triggering #GP */
> kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_SVME_ADDR_CHK);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> index a3c93f9c02847..6fa81eb3ffb78 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> @@ -234,6 +234,8 @@ struct vcpu_svm {
> bool tsc_scaling_enabled : 1;
> bool lbrv_enabled : 1;
> bool v_vmload_vmsave_enabled : 1;
> + bool pause_filter_enabled : 1;
> + bool pause_threshold_enabled : 1;
>
> u32 ldr_reg;
> u32 dfr_reg;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists