[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c5fe4f6-49bd-c87a-e76d-64417a1370c0@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 14:40:52 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: x86: nSVM: implement nested vGIF
The patch is good but I think it's possibly to rewrite some parts in an
easier way.
On 3/1/22 15:36, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>
> + if (svm->vgif_enabled && (svm->nested.ctl.int_ctl & V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK))
> + int_ctl_vmcb12_bits |= (V_GIF_MASK | V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK);
> + else
> + int_ctl_vmcb01_bits |= (V_GIF_MASK | V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK);
To remember for later: svm->vmcb's V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK is always the same
as vgif:
- if it comes from vmcb12, it must be 1 (and then vgif is also 1)
- if it comes from vmcb01, it must be equal to vgif (because
V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK is set in init_vmcb and never touched again).
>
> +static bool nested_vgif_enabled(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> +{
> + if (!is_guest_mode(&svm->vcpu) || !svm->vgif_enabled)
> + return false;
> + return svm->nested.ctl.int_ctl & V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool vgif_enabled(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> {
> - return !!(svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl & V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK);
> + struct vmcb *vmcb = nested_vgif_enabled(svm) ? svm->vmcb01.ptr : svm->vmcb;
> +
> + return !!(vmcb->control.int_ctl & V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK);
> }
>
Slight simplification:
- before the patch, vgif_enabled() is just "vgif", because
V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK is set in init_vmcb and copied to vmcb02
- after the patch, vgif_enabled() is also just "vgif". Outside guest
mode the same reasoning applies. If L2 has enabled vGIF, vmcb01's
V_GIF_ENABLE is equal to vgif per the previous bullet. If L2 has not
enabled vGIF, vmcb02's V_GIF_ENABLE uses svm->vmcb's int_ctl field which
is always the same as vgif (see remark above).
You can make this simplification a separate patch.
> static inline void enable_gif(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> {
> + struct vmcb *vmcb = nested_vgif_enabled(svm) ? svm->vmcb01.ptr : svm->vmcb;
> +
> if (vgif_enabled(svm))
> - svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl |= V_GIF_MASK;
> + vmcb->control.int_ctl |= V_GIF_MASK;
> else
> svm->vcpu.arch.hflags |= HF_GIF_MASK;
> }
>
> static inline void disable_gif(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> {
> + struct vmcb *vmcb = nested_vgif_enabled(svm) ? svm->vmcb01.ptr : svm->vmcb;
> +
> if (vgif_enabled(svm))
> - svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl &= ~V_GIF_MASK;
> + vmcb->control.int_ctl &= ~V_GIF_MASK;
> else
> svm->vcpu.arch.hflags &= ~HF_GIF_MASK;
> +
> }
Looks good. For a little optimization however you could write
static inline struct vmcb *get_vgif_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
if (!vgif)
return NULL;
if (!is_guest_mode(&svm->vcpu)
return svm->vmcb01.ptr;
if ((svm->vgif_enabled && (svm->nested.ctl.int_ctl & V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK))
return svm->vmcb01.ptr;
else
return svm->nested.vmcb02.ptr;
}
and then
struct vmcb *vmcb = get_vgif_vmcb(svm);
if (vmcb)
/* use vmcb->control.int_ctl */
else
/* use hflags */
Paolo
>
> +static bool nested_vgif_enabled(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> +{
> + if (!is_guest_mode(&svm->vcpu) || !svm->vgif_enabled)
> + return false;
> + return svm->nested.ctl.int_ctl & V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK;
> +}
> +
Powered by blists - more mailing lists