linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v0 3/6] x86: Enable Upper Address Ignore(UAI) feature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4f5e149e-aa0b-d18b-3a91-6db15c2fab64@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Mar 2022 14:46:20 -0800
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        'Andrew Cooper' <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
        "oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
        "ananth.narayan@....com" <ananth.narayan@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0 3/6] x86: Enable Upper Address Ignore(UAI) feature

On 3/10/22 14:37, David Laight wrote:
> Just letting user address space be aliased a lot of times doesn't
> seem like a security feature to me.
> It must have some strange use case.

This should have been in the changelogs... sheesh...

Right now, address sanitizers keep pointer metadata in various spots.
But, it requires recompiling apps and libraries.  These compiler-based
things are also so slow that production use is rare.

These masking things (ARM TBI, AMD UAI, Intel LAM) _theoretically_ let
you plumb enough metadata around with pointers to do address sanitizer
implementations in production.

I think LAM is the most sane of the three, but I'm biased.