[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc55e8b3-7d22-6024-374d-4ed126e18c42@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 16:32:57 +0800
From: "libaokun (A)" <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To: <richard@....at>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <yukuai3@...wei.com>, Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>,
Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ubifs: rename_whiteout: correct old_dir size
computing
A gentle ping, sorry for the noise.
在 2022/2/15 12:07, Baokun Li 写道:
> When renaming the whiteout file, the old whiteout file is not deleted.
> Therefore, we add the old dentry size to the old dir like XFS.
> Otherwise, an error may be reported due to `fscki->calc_sz != fscki->size`
> in check_indes.
>
> Fixes: 9e0a1fff8db56ea ("ubifs: Implement RENAME_WHITEOUT")
> Reported-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
> ---
> fs/ubifs/dir.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> index ae082a0be2a3..86151889548e 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> @@ -1402,6 +1402,9 @@ static int do_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> iput(whiteout);
> goto out_release;
> }
> +
> + /* Add the old_dentry size to the old_dir size. */
> + old_sz -= CALC_DENT_SIZE(fname_len(&old_nm));
> }
>
> lock_4_inodes(old_dir, new_dir, new_inode, whiteout);
--
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists