[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yinv6Dptnj0aTf/Y@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:32:40 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, knsathya@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 02/30] x86/tdx: Provide common base for SEAMCALL and
TDCALL C wrappers
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 05:27:38PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> arch/x86/include/asm/tdx.h | 28 +++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 9 ++++
> arch/x86/virt/tdxcall.S | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Right, you asked already about putting this under arch/x86/virt/ but on
a second thought, this doesn't look like
"- generic host virtualization stuff: arch/x86/virt/"
to me:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/Yg5nh1RknPRwIrb8@zn.tnic
Rather, this looks like it wants to be under
arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/
where we said that this should be the coco host code place.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists