linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: slub: Delete useless parameter of alloc_slab

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220310140701.87908-3-sxwjean@me.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Mar 2022 22:07:01 +0800
From:   sxwjean@...com
To:     cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
        iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
        longman@...hat.com, guro@...com, willy@...radead.org,
        roman.gushchin@...ux.dev
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: slub: Delete useless parameter of alloc_slab_page()

From: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>

The parameter @s is useless for alloc_slab_page(). It was added in 2014
by commit 5dfb41750992 ("sl[au]b: charge slabs to kmemcg explicitly"). The
need for it was removed in 2020 by commit 1f3147b49d75 ("mm: slub: call
account_slab_page() after slab page initialization"). Let's delete it.

[willy@...radead.org: Added detailed history of @s]
Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
---
 mm/slub.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 261474092e43..5d273ee04c43 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1788,8 +1788,8 @@ static void *setup_object(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
 /*
  * Slab allocation and freeing
  */
-static inline struct slab *alloc_slab_page(struct kmem_cache *s,
-		gfp_t flags, int node, struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo)
+static inline struct slab *alloc_slab_page(gfp_t flags, int node,
+		struct kmem_cache_order_objects oo)
 {
 	struct folio *folio;
 	struct slab *slab;
@@ -1941,7 +1941,7 @@ static struct slab *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
 	if ((alloc_gfp & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) && oo_order(oo) > oo_order(s->min))
 		alloc_gfp = (alloc_gfp | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC) & ~(__GFP_RECLAIM|__GFP_NOFAIL);
 
-	slab = alloc_slab_page(s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);
+	slab = alloc_slab_page(alloc_gfp, node, oo);
 	if (unlikely(!slab)) {
 		oo = s->min;
 		alloc_gfp = flags;
@@ -1949,7 +1949,7 @@ static struct slab *allocate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags, int node)
 		 * Allocation may have failed due to fragmentation.
 		 * Try a lower order alloc if possible
 		 */
-		slab = alloc_slab_page(s, alloc_gfp, node, oo);
+		slab = alloc_slab_page(alloc_gfp, node, oo);
 		if (unlikely(!slab))
 			goto out;
 		stat(s, ORDER_FALLBACK);
-- 
2.30.2