linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tcp: export symbol tcp_set_congestion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Mar 2022 23:03:00 +0800
From:   Mingbao Sun <sunmingbao@....com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tyler.sun@...l.com,
        ping.gan@...l.com, yanxiu.cai@...l.com, libin.zhang@...l.com,
        ao.sun@...l.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: export symbol tcp_set_congestion_control

On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:11:35 +0100
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:

> Please submit this together with the actual user(s) in a series.
> Patches to just export random symbols are a no-go.

Got it.
many thanks for informing.

BTW:
could you give me the answer to the following questions?
1. Against which repo should I prepare and test this series of patches?
   netdev or nvme?

2. what's the recipients for this series of patches?
   netdev or nvme or both?