linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kdb: Remove redundant module related references

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Mar 2022 16:19:52 +0000
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To:     Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
        hch@...radead.org, cl@...ux.com, mbenes@...e.cz,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jeyu@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
        void@...ifault.com, atomlin@...mlin.com, allen.lkml@...il.com,
        joe@...ches.com, msuchanek@...e.de, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
        jason.wessel@...driver.com, pmladek@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdb: Remove redundant module related references

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 04:01:53PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> On Fri 2022-03-11 15:47 +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On the whole it doesn't really matter much... but landing the
> > independent parts via the normal route for kgdb code reduces what I
> > have to remember acking.
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Any thoughts on this [1]? Unfortunately, the wrong In-Reply-To was
> specified. So sorry about that. I will send another iteration of the series
> so that it'll be easier for Luis to apply to mcgrof/modules-testing or
> mcgrof/modules-next but after we have more feedback.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220310102625.3441888-2-atomlin@redhat.com/

As above. I would rather not have to remember acking the header
changes as well... but it's not like the sky is going to fall in.


Daniel.