linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: ts4900: Fix comment formatting and grammar

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VfVhCa-Td+X0cg-eYPtarFyKrsF92oPB2HdraCXW2CRTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 12 Mar 2022 15:06:20 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Kris Bahnsen <kris@...eddedts.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: ts4900: Fix comment formatting and grammar

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 8:20 PM Kris Bahnsen <kris@...eddedts.com> wrote:
>
> The issues were pointed out after the prior commit was applied

Missed period in the above sentence.

Otherwise LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>

> Signed-off-by: Kris Bahnsen <kris@...eddedTS.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-ts4900.c | 12 +++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts4900.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts4900.c
> index d918d2df4de2..ede605b8e098 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts4900.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts4900.c
> @@ -55,8 +55,9 @@ static int ts4900_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>  {
>         struct ts4900_gpio_priv *priv = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>
> -       /* Only clear the OE bit here, requires a RMW. Prevents potential issue
> -        * with OE and data getting to the physical pin at different times.
> +       /*
> +        * Only clear the OE bit here, requires a RMW. Prevents a potential issue
> +        * with OE and DAT getting to the physical pin at different times.
>          */
>         return regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, offset, TS4900_GPIO_OE, 0);
>  }
> @@ -68,9 +69,10 @@ static int ts4900_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>         unsigned int reg;
>         int ret;
>
> -       /* If changing from an input to an output, we need to first set the
> -        * proper data bit to what is requested and then set OE bit. This
> -        * prevents a glitch that can occur on the IO line
> +       /*
> +        * If changing from an input to an output, we need to first set the
> +        * GPIO's DAT bit to what is requested and then set the OE bit. This
> +        * prevents a glitch that can occur on the IO line.
>          */
>         regmap_read(priv->regmap, offset, &reg);
>         if (!(reg & TS4900_GPIO_OE)) {
> --
> 2.11.0
>


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko