linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: ts4900: Fix comment formatting and grammar

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MeC-1HfCmjiWUaEutnHQ3XHK6C4V=5=gn9_aPSSd7ZvLA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:46:44 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Kris Bahnsen <kris@...eddedts.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: ts4900: Fix comment formatting and grammar

On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 2:06 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 8:20 PM Kris Bahnsen <kris@...eddedts.com> wrote:
> >
> > The issues were pointed out after the prior commit was applied
>
> Missed period in the above sentence.
>
> Otherwise LGTM,
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Kris Bahnsen <kris@...eddedTS.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpio-ts4900.c | 12 +++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts4900.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts4900.c
> > index d918d2df4de2..ede605b8e098 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts4900.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-ts4900.c
> > @@ -55,8 +55,9 @@ static int ts4900_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> >  {
> >         struct ts4900_gpio_priv *priv = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> >
> > -       /* Only clear the OE bit here, requires a RMW. Prevents potential issue
> > -        * with OE and data getting to the physical pin at different times.
> > +       /*
> > +        * Only clear the OE bit here, requires a RMW. Prevents a potential issue
> > +        * with OE and DAT getting to the physical pin at different times.
> >          */
> >         return regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, offset, TS4900_GPIO_OE, 0);
> >  }
> > @@ -68,9 +69,10 @@ static int ts4900_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> >         unsigned int reg;
> >         int ret;
> >
> > -       /* If changing from an input to an output, we need to first set the
> > -        * proper data bit to what is requested and then set OE bit. This
> > -        * prevents a glitch that can occur on the IO line
> > +       /*
> > +        * If changing from an input to an output, we need to first set the
> > +        * GPIO's DAT bit to what is requested and then set the OE bit. This
> > +        * prevents a glitch that can occur on the IO line.
> >          */
> >         regmap_read(priv->regmap, offset, &reg);
> >         if (!(reg & TS4900_GPIO_OE)) {
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko

Added the missing period and applied.

Bart