lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 12 Mar 2022 19:14:37 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Estner <michaelestner@....de>
Cc:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        kernel-janitor-commits@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: usbtouchscreen: use kzalloc

On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 06:22:30PM +0100, Michael Estner wrote:
> Use kzalloc instead of kmalloc + memset.
> 
> The semantic patch that makes this change is:
> (https://coccinelle.gitlabpages.inria.fr/website/)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Estner <michaelestner@....de>
> ---
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
> index 43c521f50c85..159e1ac6198a 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/usbtouchscreen.c
> @@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static int nexio_init(struct usbtouch_usb *usbtouch)
>  	if (!input_ep || !output_ep)
>  		return -ENXIO;
> 
> -	buf = kmalloc(NEXIO_BUFSIZE, GFP_NOIO);
> +	buf = kzalloc(NEXIO_BUFSIZE, GFP_NOIO);
>  	if (!buf)
>  		goto out_buf;
> 
> @@ -998,7 +998,6 @@ static int nexio_init(struct usbtouch_usb *usbtouch)
> 
>  	/* read replies */
>  	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -		memset(buf, 0, NEXIO_BUFSIZE);
>  		ret = usb_bulk_msg(dev, usb_rcvbulkpipe(dev, input_ep),
>  				   buf, NEXIO_BUFSIZE, &actual_len,
>  				   NEXIO_TIMEOUT);

NAK

The new code is not equivalent to the old so that semantic patch must be
broken.

The current code is clearing the buffer before each read, after this
patch it would only be cleared once.

Johan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ