[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220314141008.13e32acd@coco.lan>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 14:10:08 +0100
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
To: Hugues FRUCHET - FOSS <hugues.fruchet@...s.st.com>
Cc: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>,
Niklas Söderlund
<niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>,
Dmitriy Ulitin <ulitin@...ras.ru>,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@...ndi.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Ming Qian <ming.qian@....com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...asonboard.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/24] media: platform: rename stm32/ to sti/stm32/
Em Mon, 14 Mar 2022 12:34:47 +0100
Hugues FRUCHET - FOSS <hugues.fruchet@...s.st.com> escreveu:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> Ideally we would like to stick to sti/ and stm32/ at same level, as it
> is done in various other locations:
>
> ./Documentation/arm/sti/
> ./Documentation/arm/stm32/
>
> ./arch/arm/mach-sti
> ./arch/arm/mach-stm32
>
> ./drivers/media/cec/platform/sti/
> ./drivers/media/cec/platform/stm32/
>
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/sti/
> ./drivers/gpu/drm/stm/
>
> ./sound/soc/sti/
> ./sound/soc/stm/
>
> Is this possible to keep those media folders as is ?
If we add them under:
./drivers/media/platform/stm/sti/
./drivers/media/platform/stm/stm32/
They'll both be at the same level.
It has been increasingly hard to maintain media/platform, as the file
become too big and disorganized. Sorting it per-vendor seems to be the
best thing, as it will keep things better organized.
As a side effect, with such kind of change, it is now possible to
have a MAINTAINERS entry that would point to a mailing list and/or
some SoC maintainers/reviewers that should be c/c to all patches
affecting drivers/media/platform/<vendor>.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists