linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v5.18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjEVLfoypyZHwdLjh3vX_BSJO1JJBjha2XgcghSX=sdgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:17:13 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v5.18

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 8:49 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> OK, I was apparently unable to distinguish v5.17-rc8 from v5.18 yesterday
> evening.  :-/
>
> I will resent both pull requests next week, and please accept my apologies
> for the bother.

"resent" and "resend" are very different ;)

Anyway, no bother - I just assumed this meant that you sent your pull
request for 5.18 early. Which is very much ok, and no bother at all.
In fact, if things are ready, early pull requests are generally good
things.

But since you resent them, I'll just archive this email (and the LKMM
one), and am now expecting a new set of pull requests that you don't
hate that much later..

               Linus