linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v5.18

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220314202810.GX4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:28:10 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v5.18

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 01:17:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 8:49 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > OK, I was apparently unable to distinguish v5.17-rc8 from v5.18 yesterday
> > evening.  :-/
> >
> > I will resent both pull requests next week, and please accept my apologies
> > for the bother.
> 
> "resent" and "resend" are very different ;)

;-) ;-) ;-)

> Anyway, no bother - I just assumed this meant that you sent your pull
> request for 5.18 early. Which is very much ok, and no bother at all.
> In fact, if things are ready, early pull requests are generally good
> things.
> 
> But since you resent them, I'll just archive this email (and the LKMM
> one), and am now expecting a new set of pull requests that you don't
> hate that much later..

Glad I could provide a laugh and good to know on the possibility of
sending them early.  Monday mornings!!!  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul