linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 -next] i2c: designware: Remove code duplication

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e55f8d50-c5f5-83b3-a61a-97430c634230@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:03:51 +0200
From:   Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, upstream@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] i2c: designware: Remove code duplication

On 3/11/22 22:51, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:09:32PM +0100, Jan Dabros wrote:
>> Simplify code by moving common part to one function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>
>> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Is it really based on for-next? I can't apply the patch. Am I missing
> something?
> 
Looks like Jan's patch is done without commit 1e4fe5430bd7 ("i2c: 
designware: remove unneeded semicolon") and that causes the git am not 
able to apply it while plain patch is not so strict "Hunk #2 succeeded 
at 260 with fuzz 1.".

Jarkko