lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:03:51 +0200 From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com> To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, upstream@...ihalf.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] i2c: designware: Remove code duplication On 3/11/22 22:51, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:09:32PM +0100, Jan Dabros wrote: >> Simplify code by moving common part to one function. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com> >> Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> > > Is it really based on for-next? I can't apply the patch. Am I missing > something? > Looks like Jan's patch is done without commit 1e4fe5430bd7 ("i2c: designware: remove unneeded semicolon") and that causes the git am not able to apply it while plain patch is not so strict "Hunk #2 succeeded at 260 with fuzz 1.". Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists