[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yi8WoC40tb8ulrmd@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:19:12 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: 王擎 <wangqing@...o.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: topology: make cache topology separate from cpu
topology
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:37:48AM +0000, 王擎 wrote:
> > If you want to represent L2, use the new fangled cluster level or
> > something, that's what it's there for.
> >
> > That is, you can represent the above like:
> >
> > DIE: 0-7
> > MC: 0-3, 4-7
> > CLS: 0-1,1-2, 4-5,6-7
> >
> > But if there is cache at MC, LLC is what it is.
>
> There is no CLS support for LTS now, any plans to backport?
-ENOTMYPROBLEM
Powered by blists - more mailing lists