linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: dts: sun7i: A20-olinuxino-lime2: Fix ethernet phy-mode"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:51:02 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Petr Štetiar <ynezz@...e.cz>
Cc:     Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Bastien Roucariès <rouca@...ian.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: dts: sun7i: A20-olinuxino-lime2: Fix
 ethernet phy-mode"

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 08:28:58AM +0100, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Petr Štetiar <ynezz@...e.cz> [2022-03-08 13:55:30]:
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> one week has passed and as I didn't received any feedback, I'm providing more
> details in a hope to make it more clear, why I think, that this fix is wrong
> and should be reverted in LTS kernels 5.10 and 5.15.

Why not reverted in Linus's tree first?  Shouldn't that be also broken
here?

thanks,

greg k-h