linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/29] 4.19.235-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YjGfFjzdemmtiJE2@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:25:58 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/29] 4.19.235-rc2 review

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:51:23PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 04:00:14PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.235 release.
> > There are 29 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:59:12 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 156 pass: 153 fail: 3
> Failed builds:
> 	ia64:defconfig
> 	ia64:allnoconfig
> 	ia64:tinyconfig
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 425 pass: 425 fail: 0
> 
> Build failures as already reported.
> 
> arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c: In function 'acpi_numa_fixup':
> arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c:540:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'slit_distance'; did you mean 'node_distance'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   540 |                 slit_distance(0, 0) = LOCAL_DISTANCE;
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                 node_distance
> arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c:540:37: error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment
>   540 |                 slit_distance(0, 0) = LOCAL_DISTANCE;
>       |                                     ^
> 
> Tested-and-reported-failed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>

Crap, ok, I'll go drop the 3 patches that this change came from.  Odds
are someone still uses ia64...

thanks,

greg k-h