linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] net:bonding:Add support for IPV6 RLB to balance-alb mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c5d18455-c2ff-6e1d-c2d5-55417995c014@chinatelecom.cn>
Date:   Wed, 16 Mar 2022 16:45:05 +0800
From:   孙守鑫 <sunshouxin@...natelecom.cn>
To:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:     j.vosburgh@...il.com, vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        dsahern@...nel.org, oliver@...kum.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, huyd12@...natelecom.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] net:bonding:Add support for IPV6 RLB to
 balance-alb mode


在 2022/3/15 19:13, Jiri Pirko 写道:
> Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 08:30:07AM CET, sunshouxin@...natelecom.cn wrote:
>> This patch is implementing IPV6 RLB for balance-alb mode.
> Out of curiosity, what is exactly your usecase? I'm asking because
> I don't see any good reason to use RLB/ALB modes. I have to be missing
> something.


This is previous discusion thread：

https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4187085.html