lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:57:05 +0100 From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> To: 孙守鑫 <sunshouxin@...natelecom.cn> Cc: j.vosburgh@...il.com, vfalico@...il.com, andy@...yhouse.net, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, dsahern@...nel.org, oliver@...kum.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, huyd12@...natelecom.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] net:bonding:Add support for IPV6 RLB to balance-alb mode Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:45:05AM CET, sunshouxin@...natelecom.cn wrote: > >在 2022/3/15 19:13, Jiri Pirko 写道: >> Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 08:30:07AM CET, sunshouxin@...natelecom.cn wrote: >> > This patch is implementing IPV6 RLB for balance-alb mode. >> Out of curiosity, what is exactly your usecase? I'm asking because >> I don't see any good reason to use RLB/ALB modes. I have to be missing >> something. > > >This is previous discusion thread: > >https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4187085.html I don't see how it even remotely answers my question. Could you please spell it out for me here again? Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists