[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220317162033.GP4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 09:20:33 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RCU: undefined reference to irq_work_queue
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 03:24:42PM +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 07:00:00AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:32:53AM +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > > Hello RCU folks,
> > >
> > > I like to use minimal configuration for kernel development.
> > > when building with tinyconfig + CONFIG_PREEMPT=y on arm64:
> > >
> > > ld: kernel/rcu/update.o: in function `call_rcu_tasks':
> > > update.c:(.text+0xb2c): undefined reference to `irq_work_queue'
> > > update.c:(.text+0xb2c): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against undefined symbol `irq_work_queue'
> > > make: *** [Makefile:1155: vmlinux] Error 1
> > >
> > > It seems RCU calls irq_work_queue() without checking if CONFIG_IRQ_WORK is enabled.
> >
> > Indeed it does!
> >
> > And kernel/rcu/Kconfig shows why:
> >
> > config TASKS_TRACE_RCU
> > def_bool 0
> > select IRQ_WORK
> > help
> > This option enables a task-based RCU implementation that uses
> > explicit rcu_read_lock_trace() read-side markers, and allows
> > these readers to appear in the idle loop as well as on the CPU
> > hotplug code paths. It can force IPIs on online CPUs, including
> > idle ones, so use with caution.
> >
> > So the solution is to further minimize your configuration so as to
> > deselect TASKS_TRACE_RCU.
>
> They are already not selected.
Good, thank you.
How about TASKS_RUDE_RCU, TASKS_TRACE_RCU, and TASKS_RCU_GENERIC?
> > This means making sure that both BPF and
> > the various RCU torture tests are all deselected.
>
> I wanted to say call_rcu_tasks() can be referenced even when IRQ_WORK is not
> selected, making it fail to build.
I am guessing because TASKS_RCU_GENERIC is selected?
If so, does the patch at the end of this email help?
> > > ld: kernel/rcu/update.o: in function `call_rcu_tasks':
> > > update.c:(.text+0xb2c): undefined reference to `irq_work_queue'
> > > update.c:(.text+0xb2c): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against undefined symbol `irq_work_queue'
> > > make: *** [Makefile:1155: vmlinux] Error 1
>
> Isn't it better to fix this build failure?
But of course! However, first I need to know exactly what is causing your
build failure. I cannot see your .config file, so I am having to guess.
Don't get me wrong, I do have a lot of practice guessing, but it is still
just guessing. ;-)
> It fails to build when both TASKS_TRACE_RCU and IRQ_WORK are not selected
> and PREEMPT is selected.
>
> │ Symbol: TASKS_TRACE_RCU [=n] │
> │ Type : bool │
> │ Defined at kernel/rcu/Kconfig:96 │
> │ Selects: IRQ_WORK [=n] │
> │ Selected by [n]: │
> │ - BPF_SYSCALL [=n] │
> │ - RCU_SCALE_TEST [=n] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] │
> │ - RCU_TORTURE_TEST [=n] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] │
> │ - RCU_REF_SCALE_TEST [=n] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y]
>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> > Or turn on IRQ_WORK, for example, if you need to use BPF.
Or do you already have TASKS_RCU_GENERIC deselected?
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
index bf8e341e75b4..f559870fbf8b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
+++ b/kernel/rcu/Kconfig
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ config TASKS_RCU
config TASKS_RUDE_RCU
def_bool 0
+ select IRQ_WORK
help
This option enables a task-based RCU implementation that uses
only context switch (including preemption) and user-mode
Powered by blists - more mailing lists