linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: use literal block instead of code-block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABVgOSngfB41BVoEvQ1JX+2oFvS7Mik58VfPm9pydmiC_GSD6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:43:11 +0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Rae Moar <rmr167@...il.com>,
        Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>, kernelci@...ups.io,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] Documentation: dev-tools: use literal block
 instead of code-block

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 4:26 AM <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>
> KTAP Specification: Change code-block directives to straightforward
> literal blocks since the blocks do not contain code.
>
> Suggested-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
> ---

This looks good to me.

I'd personally rather push this through independently of the KTAP 2.0
spec updates, as it's really just a minor formatting change to the
spec, and it has no impact on the actual KTAP format.

So, if we can accept this independently, that'd be swell.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>

Cheers,
-- David


>  Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst | 18 ++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
> index 37b5dc61bfb8..b9a57ceddd4f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
> @@ -115,34 +115,32 @@ The diagnostic data field is optional, and results which have neither a
>  directive nor any diagnostic data do not need to include the "#" field
>  separator.
>
> -Example result lines include:
> -
> -.. code-block:: none
> +Example result lines include::
>
>         ok 1 test_case_name
>
>  The test "test_case_name" passed.
>
> -.. code-block:: none
> +::
>
>         not ok 1 test_case_name
>
>  The test "test_case_name" failed.
>
> -.. code-block:: none
> +::
>
>         ok 1 test # SKIP necessary dependency unavailable
>
>  The test "test" was SKIPPED with the diagnostic message "necessary dependency
>  unavailable".
>
> -.. code-block:: none
> +::
>
>         not ok 1 test # TIMEOUT 30 seconds
>
>  The test "test" timed out, with diagnostic data "30 seconds".
>
> -.. code-block:: none
> +::
>
>         ok 5 check return code # rcode=0
>
> @@ -202,7 +200,7 @@ allowed to be either indented or not indented.
>
>  An example of a test with two nested subtests:
>
> -.. code-block:: none
> +::
>
>         KTAP version 1
>         1..1
> @@ -215,7 +213,7 @@ An example of a test with two nested subtests:
>
>  An example format with multiple levels of nested testing:
>
> -.. code-block:: none
> +::
>
>         KTAP version 1
>         1..2
> @@ -250,7 +248,7 @@ nested version line, uses a line of the form
>
>  Example KTAP output
>  --------------------
> -.. code-block:: none
> +::
>
>         KTAP version 1
>         1..1
> --
> Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4003 bytes)