linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mvebu: Document bindings for AC5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9143a2b5-8d53-9767-ea3c-d2b3555333f2@canonical.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Mar 2022 16:16:24 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        "sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mvebu: Document bindings for
 AC5

On 17/03/2022 15:14, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> What do you mean "driver fails to load"? You control the driver, don't
>> you?
> 
> It is a thin wrapper around the mvebu driver, which does all the real
> work. So no, Chris does not really control what the core of the driver
> does.

This this design still require a pinctrl to be a child of some node?

> 
> The existing binding documentation says:
> 
>     * Marvell Armada 37xx SoC pin and gpio controller
> 
>     Each Armada 37xx SoC come with two pin and gpio controller one for
>     the south bridge and the other for the north bridge.
> 
>     Inside this set of register the gpio latch allows exposing some
>     configuration of the SoC and especially the clock frequency of the
>     xtal. Hence, this node is a represent as syscon allowing sharing
>     the register between multiple hardware block.
> 
> 
> So the syscon is there to allow the clock driver to share the register
> space.


This makes sense. Solution here would be to add syscon compatible to
pinctrl node. This parent simple-mfd+syscon node looks like a workaround
to share some registers in a highly flexible way. However isn't it
better to have more obvious owner of the register space (e.g. pinctrl)?
IOW, if there is only one child of syscon+simple-mfd node, why not
getting rid of it and making pinctrl owner of this address space? It's
also simpler code.


Best regards,
Krzysztof