linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 2/2] rcu: Invert the locking dependency order between rcu_state.barrier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Mar 2022 16:07:19 +0800
From:   Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
To:     paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org
Cc:     rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] rcu: Invert the locking dependency order between rcu_state.barrier_mutex and hotplug lock

When call rcutree_prepare_cpu(), the cpus write lock has been held,
just lock the barrier_mutex before calling rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload()
from failure path. therefore, invert the locking dependency order.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index e8265e4ec5ee..fe0063a23fbb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -1072,8 +1072,8 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload(int cpu)
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
 	cpus_read_lock();
+	mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
 	if (rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
 		if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
 			ret = work_on_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_rdp_deoffload, rdp);
@@ -1084,8 +1084,8 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload(int cpu)
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 		}
 	}
-	cpus_read_unlock();
 	mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
+	cpus_read_unlock();
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1167,8 +1167,8 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_offload(int cpu)
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
 	cpus_read_lock();
+	mutex_lock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
 	if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
 		if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
 			ret = work_on_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_rdp_offload, rdp);
@@ -1179,8 +1179,8 @@ int rcu_nocb_cpu_offload(int cpu)
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 		}
 	}
-	cpus_read_unlock();
 	mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.barrier_mutex);
+	cpus_read_unlock();
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.25.1