[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AS8PR04MB8404817B9ECE889A19A2186692149@AS8PR04MB8404.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2022 09:53:05 +0000
From: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add ddr controller node to support
EDAC on imx8mp
Hi Krzysztof,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mp: add ddr controller node to support
> EDAC on imx8mp
>
> On 18/03/2022 12:35, Sherry Sun wrote:
> > i.MX8MP use synopsys V3.70a ddr controller IP, so add edac support for
> > i.MX8MP based on "snps,ddrc-3.80a" synopsys edac driver.
>
> One more point - I think it might be worth to add dedicated compatible for
> v3.70, as it is clearly a different version (with fallback to v3.80a).
Thanks for the review, I have check the V3.70a and V3.80a Synopsys ddr controller databook, there is no difference for the inline ECC part.
So do you think we still need to add a new compatible for V3.70a even the EDAC driver operation is totally same with V3.80a?
Best regards
Sherry
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists