[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjeY7CfaFKjr8IUc@antec>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 06:13:16 +0900
From: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Openrisc <openrisc@...ts.librecores.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] openrisc: Move to ticket-spinlock
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 12:36:31PM +0900, Stafford Horne wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2022, 12:05 PM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi openrisc guys,
> >
> > > kernel/signal.c:2625:49: sparse: expected struct sighand_struct
> > *sighand
> > > kernel/signal.c:2625:49: sparse: got struct sighand_struct
> > [noderef] __rcu *sighand
> >
> > Some warning here, Is that all right? I don't think it is because of
> > changing arch_spinlock_t from struct qspinlock to atomic_t.
> >
>
> I haven't built or tested this series yet. But this doesn't look like a
> new problem. It looks like this patch series may have introduced a new
> instance of the existing issue.
>
> I have some patches to clean up sparse warnings and I've seen this pattern
> before but haven't spent the time to clean it up. This is a good
> opportunity to do that now. Let me have a look in the next few days.
Hello Guo Ren,
I was able to build the patch series for OpenRISC, but after applying the
openrisc SMP kernel build no longer can boot. It doesn't boot on single core
system or multi-core systems. I don't get any console output to help with
debugging it.
It may take be a bit longer to debug this.
-Stafford
Powered by blists - more mailing lists