[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1647855901.ds85pb94ut.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 15:18:47 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "aik@...abs.ru" <aik@...abs.ru>,
"jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] objtool: Enable and implement 'mcount' subcommand
Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 21/03/2022 à 09:19, Naveen N. Rao a écrit :
>> Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>
>> We don't enable ftrace for vdso, so I suspect objtool run above will be
>> a no-op. This needs to be confirmed, of course.
>>
>
> I just checked without the series: recordmcount isn't run for VDSO, so
> objtool shouldn't be run either when the series is applied.
Agree. I was only pointing out that it would be harmless, but it is good
to ensure objtool is skipped for files/directories where ftrace isn't
enabled. recordmcount keys off the presence of CC_FLAGS_FTRACE, and we
should do the same for 'objtool --mcount'.
- Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists