linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: Drop CONFIG_DEBUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf8ktdCYTAULz2j-3CPON75707TpwV0FDL36V_GQ4Ttgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Mar 2022 16:39:57 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@...k-chips.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Drop CONFIG_DEBUG_GPIO

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 6:35 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:09 AM Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org> wrote:

> I like it. It's true we don't see many of those DEBUG constructs
> anymore nowadays and overhead for might_sleep() and WARN_ON() is
> negligible.

I don't like the part about removing -DDEBUG at all.

> Applied, thanks!

Shall I send a partial revert?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko