lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5eed58a1-ee56-8aee-e73b-76b162d59873@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 23 Mar 2022 12:19:57 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>
Cc:     Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] soc: apple: Add RTKit IPC library

On 21/03/2022 17:50, Sven Peter wrote:
> Apple SoCs such as the M1 come with multiple embedded co-processors
> running proprietary firmware. Communication with those is established
> over a simple mailbox using the RTKit IPC protocol.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/apple/Kconfig          |  13 +
>  drivers/soc/apple/Makefile         |   3 +
>  drivers/soc/apple/rtkit-crashlog.c | 147 +++++
>  drivers/soc/apple/rtkit-internal.h |  76 +++
>  drivers/soc/apple/rtkit.c          | 842 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/soc/apple/rtkit.h    | 203 +++++++
>  6 files changed, 1284 insertions(+)

Isn't this some implementation of a mailbox? If so, it should be in
drivers/mailbox. Please don't put all stuff in soc/apple, that's not how
Linux is organized. To drivers/soc usually we put drivers which do not
fit regular subsystems.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ