[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjspMR6gJ5AWjE8Q@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 15:05:37 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
namhyung@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
duanxiongchun@...edance.com, songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] perf/core: Introduce percpu
perf_cgroup
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 09:37:16PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> But you are right, having cpuctx->cgrp and cpu_perf_cgroup make things confused..
> maybe we can delete cpuctx->cgrp, change to use percpu cpu_perf_cgroup?
I'm hoping to soon (*finally*!) have some time for this again:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220113134743.1292-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com
That should get us a single cpuctx.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists