lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220324164238.1274915-1-ytcoode@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:42:38 +0800
From:   Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc:     Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix maximum permitted number of arguments check

Since the m->arg_size array can hold up to MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS argument
sizes, it's ok that nargs is equal to MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS.

Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 24788ce564a0..0918a39279f6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -5507,7 +5507,7 @@ int btf_distill_func_proto(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 	}
 	args = (const struct btf_param *)(func + 1);
 	nargs = btf_type_vlen(func);
-	if (nargs >= MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS) {
+	if (nargs > MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS) {
 		bpf_log(log,
 			"The function %s has %d arguments. Too many.\n",
 			tname, nargs);
-- 
2.35.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ