lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220324183423.6ht7hlat52ucsvfh@kafai-mbp>
Date:   Thu, 24 Mar 2022 11:34:23 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Fix maximum permitted number of arguments
 check

On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:42:38AM +0800, Yuntao Wang wrote:
> Since the m->arg_size array can hold up to MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS argument
> sizes, it's ok that nargs is equal to MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ